Skip to main content
Eighth Circuit· 7/14/1994

Henderson v. Baird

Citations

  • 29 F.3d 464
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 17241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a finding that a disciplinary was based on some evidence “essentially checkmates” a retaliation claim
  • holding that a disciplinary decision affirming a charge “based on some evidence of the violation . . . essentially checkmates [a] retaliation claim”
  • concluding that because the finding of guilt in the inmate’s disciplinary hearing was based on “some evidence,” that finding “essentially checkmates his retaliation claim”
  • holding if there is “some evidence” that a prisoner committed the alleged misconduct, that “essentially checkmates his retaliation claim.”
  • holding that a disciplinary decision affirming a charge “checkmates [a] retaliation claim”
  • stating that a corrections officer’s description of events constitutes some evidence upon which a prison disciplinary committee could determine that an inmate violated a prison rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.