Henderson v. Baird

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a finding that a disciplinary was based on some evidence “essentially checkmates” a retaliation claim
• holding that a disciplinary decision affirming a charge “based on some evidence of the violation . . . essentially checkmates [a] retaliation claim”
• concluding that because the finding of guilt in the inmate’s disciplinary hearing was based on “some evidence,” that finding “essentially checkmates his retaliation claim”
• holding if there is “some evidence” that a prisoner committed the alleged misconduct, that “essentially checkmates his retaliation claim.”
• holding that a disciplinary decision affirming a charge “checkmates [a] retaliation claim”
• stating that a corrections officer’s description of events constitutes some evidence upon which a prison disciplinary committee could determine that an inmate violated a prison rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).