Eighth Circuit· 7/14/1994

Henderson v. Baird

Citations

29 F.3d 464
1994 WL 362701

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a finding that a disciplinary was based on some evidence “essentially checkmates” a retaliation claim
holding that if a prison disciplinary committee's finding of a violation of prison rules is based on some evidence, that “finding essentially checkmates [a] retaliation claim”
holding that if a prison disciplinary committee’s finding of a violation of prison rules is based on some evidence, that “finding essentially checkmates [a] retaliation claim”
holding that if a prison disciplinary committee’s finding of a violation of prison rules is based on some evidence, that “finding essentially checkmates [a] retaliation claim”
holding that if a prison disciplinary committee's finding of a violation of prison rules is based on some evidence, that “finding essentially checkmates [a] retaliation claim”
finding that disciplinary is based on some evidence of violation \essentially checkmates\ retaliation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Bowman, Hansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

45 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Henderson v. Baird

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.