Supreme Court· 6/18/1979
Helstoski v. Meanor
Citations
- 442 U.S. 500
- 99 S. Ct. 2445
- 61 L. Ed. 2d 30
- 1979 U.S. LEXIS 112
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the Speech and Debate Clause establishes immunity from suit and permitting immediate appeal
- holding that an order denying the protection of the Speech or Debate Clause is immediately appealable
- holding that an order denying the protection of the Speech or Debate Clause is immediately appealable
- holding that the Speech and Debate Clause establishes immunity from suit and permitting immediate appeal
- holding that an order denying the protection of the Speech and Debate Clause is immediately appealable
- concluding that “if a Member ‘is to avoid' exposure to [being questioned for acts done in either House] and thereby enjoy the full protection of the Clause, his ... challenge to the indictment must be reviewable before ... exposure [to trial] occurs’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Burgee, Brennan, Burger, Stewart, White, Marshall, Blackmun, Rehnquist, Stevens, Beennan, Powell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
306 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 8,858×
- Behrens v. PelletierSupreme Court· 1996-02-21· cited 2,084×
- Sell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2003-06-16· cited 1,055×
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-02-21· cited 989×
- Nixon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 972×
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 964×
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-03-28· cited 910×
- Richardson-Merrell Inc. v. Koller Ex Rel. KollerSupreme Court· 1985-06-17· cited 814×
- Osborn v. HaleySupreme Court· 2007-01-22· cited 582×
- Kulwicki v. DawsonThird Circuit· 1992-07-02· cited 452×
- United States v. Hollywood Motor Car Co.Supreme Court· 1982-06-28· cited 368×
- Coastal Steel Corp. v. Tilghman Wheelabrator Ltd.Third Circuit· 1983-05-17· cited 365×
- United States v. HubbardD.C. Circuit· 1980-07-24· cited 350×
- Johnson v. FankellSupreme Court· 1997-06-09· cited 302×
- Jenkins v. MedfordFourth Circuit· 1997-08-07· cited 289×
- In Re Ford Motor CompanyThird Circuit· 1997-05-02· cited 283×
- Lauro Lines S.R.L. v. ChasserSupreme Court· 1989-05-22· cited 268×
- Romero-Barcelo v. Hernandez-AgostoFirst Circuit· 1996-01-31· cited 195×
- Chinchello v. FentonThird Circuit· 1986-11-14· cited 185×
- Perry, Ex Parte James Richard \Rick\Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2016-02-24· cited 183×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,854×
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-06-09· cited 2,295×
- Dombrowski v. EastlandSupreme Court· 1967-05-15· cited 539×
- United States v. BrewsterSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 538×
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1966-02-24· cited 407×
- United States v. Domenic Nicholas DisilvioThird Circuit· 1975-07-17· cited 41×
- United States v. Henry Helstoski. Henry Helstoski v. United States of America, Honorable H. Curtis Meanor, United States District Judge, NominalThird Circuit· 1978-04-13· cited 36×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.