D. New Jersey· 8/6/2002
Heir v. Delaware River Port Authority
Citations
- 218 F. Supp. 2d 627
- 2002 WL 1796580
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a Mobile Oil franchise that was lost as the result of condemnation was not a compensable taking under the Fifth Amendment
- holding that franchisees had no right to compensation for loss of their business where they had contracted away their right to the continuation of their franchise beyond the condemnation of the premises
- rooting the doctrine in “several of the New Jersey Rules of Court,” including Rules 4:30A and 4:5-1(b)(2)
- \[T]he right to compensation extends only as far as a party's contractual rights permit.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Irenas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Clark v. Burger King Corp.D. New Jersey· 2003-04-04· cited 41×
- James Ricketti v. Shaun BarryThird Circuit· 2015-01-07· cited 39×
- Mamo v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-10-18· cited 13×
- Heughs Land, L.L.C. v. Holladay CityCourt of Appeals of Utah· 2005-05-12· cited 9×
- Bajwa v. Sunoco, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2004-01-16· cited 5×
- Utah Dep't of Transp. v. Kmart Corp.Utah Supreme Court· 2018-09-25
Cites
57 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court· 1967-05-22· cited 6,135×
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 4,909×
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 3,324×
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court· 1984-01-23· cited 3,103×
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 2,607×
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court· 1985-06-26· cited 1,691×
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court· 1984-06-26· cited 1,423×
- Texas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-03-31· cited 1,234×
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 1,118×
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court· 1945-04-02· cited 900×
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court· 2002-04-23· cited 862×
- Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-02-26· cited 681×
- Phillips v. Washington Legal FoundationSupreme Court· 1998-06-15· cited 509×
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1949-06-27· cited 443×
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court· 1946-03-25· cited 433×
- Omnia Commercial Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1923-04-01· cited 296×
- Vera L. POLLOCK, Appellant, v. AMERICAN TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH LONG LINESThird Circuit· 1986-06-30· cited 272×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.