· 10/18/2007
Mamo v. District of Columbia
Citations
- 934 A.2d 376
- 2007 D.C. App. LEXIS 591
- 2007 WL 3022550
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying apportionment claim under section 2802(d)(1) because state law on condemnation did not allow recovery for loss of business
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farrell, Reid, Fisher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.