Skip to main content

Hefty v. Comprehensive Care Corporation

Citations

  • 766 P.2d 1026
  • 307 Or. 247
  • 1988 Ore. LEXIS 771

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding a trial court’s grant of summary judgment in an “extreme case” on a negligence question usually reserved for the jury
  • affirming grant of summary judgment and noting that “a court can decide that no reasonable fact- finder could find the risk foreseeable” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • affirming grant of summary judg- ment and noting that “a court can decide that no reasonable factfinder could find the risk foreseeable” (internal quota- tion marks omitted)
  • an illustration of the type of harmful event that was not foreseeable as a matter of law
  • an illustration of the type of harmful event that was not foreseeable as a matter of law
  • “There is sufficient evidence of factual causation * * *. Rather, the critical issue is whether plaintiffs market losses were a reasonably foreseeable result of defendant’s wrongful conduct.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peterson, Linde, Campbell, Carson, Jones, Gillette, Van Hoomissen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Hefty v. Comprehensive Care Corporation

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.