Skip to main content
· 12/11/2002

Sande v. City of Portland

Citations

  • 59 P.3d 595
  • 185 Or. App. 262
  • 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1962

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a discretionary immunity defense requires evidence of the actual consideration process by which a decision was reached
  • given repeated assaults and robberies of lone victims by a “mountain-bike” assailant, the city had reason to foresee harm to plaintiff from its instruction to neighbor not to warn plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haselton, Kistler, Deits

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.