Idaho Supreme Court· 10/8/1980

Hecla Mining Co. v. Bunker Hill Co.

Citations

617 P.2d 861
101 Idaho 557
1980 Ida. LEXIS 504

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

analyzing the parties’ submissions, along with the original agreement, in determining the arbitrator’s authority, and concluding that the resulting grant of authority was very broad absent “express limitation”
\We note that our view of the proper scope of judicial review of commercial arbitrator's awards does not vary significantly depending upon which act applies.\
“We note that our view of the proper scope of judicial review of commercial arbitrator’s awards does not vary significantly depending upon which act applies.”
\federal law concerning the review of arbitrator's awards applies since the underlying factual situation here clearly concerns interstate commerce. Therefore we utilize the [FAA] and the cases thereunder instead of Idaho's enactment of the [UAA] . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFadden, Donaldson, Shepard, Bakes, Bistline

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.