Skip to main content
· 10/8/1980

Hecla Mining Co. v. Bunker Hill Co.

Citations

  • 617 P.2d 861
  • 101 Idaho 557
  • 1980 Ida. LEXIS 504

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • analyzing the parties’ submissions, along with the original agreement, in determining the arbitrator’s authority, and concluding that the resulting grant of authority was very broad absent “express limitation”
  • \We note that our view of the proper scope of judicial review of commercial arbitrator's awards does not vary significantly depending upon which act applies.\
  • “We note that our view of the proper scope of judicial review of commercial arbitrator’s awards does not vary significantly depending upon which act applies.”
  • \federal law concerning the review of arbitrator's awards applies since the underlying factual situation here clearly concerns interstate commerce. Therefore we utilize the [FAA] and the cases thereunder instead of Idaho's enactment of the [UAA] . . . .\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McFadden, Donaldson, Shepard, Bakes, Bistline

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.