Skip to main content
· 1/14/1969

Ludwig Honold Mfg. Co. v. Harold A. Fletcher and United Automobile Workers, Local 416

Citations

  • 405 F.2d 1123
  • 70 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2368

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting limited review but stating that arbitrator’s interpretation must still be derived from the agreement
  • noting limited review but stating that arbitrator’s interpretation must still be derived from the agreement
  • noting limited review but stating that arbitrator’s interpretation must still be derived from agreement
  • noting limited review but stating that arbitrator's interpretation must still be derived from agreement
  • noting limited review but stating that arbitrator's interpretation must still be derived from agreement
  • “Where ambiguity exists, the minor provision must be construed as not to conflict with the main purpose of the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hastie, Seitz, Aldisert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.