California Court of Appeal· 6/2/1967
Healy v. Brewster
Citations
- 251 Cal. App. 2d 541
- 59 Cal. Rptr. 752
- 1967 Cal. App. LEXIS 2004
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Where the 16 terms of a written contract require that extra work be approved in writing, such provision 17 may be altered or waived by an executed oral modification of the contract.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Frampton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Raedeke v. Gibraltar Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-01-21· cited 126×
- Susan J. Mayors v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueNinth Circuit· 1986-03-24· cited 50×
- Acoustics, Inc. v. Trepte Construction Co.California Court of Appeal· 1971-01-29· cited 28×
- Merced County Mut. Fire Ins. v. ST. OF CALIFORNIACalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-08-23· cited 26×
- RELIANCE FINANCE CORPORATION and Romer, O’Connor & Co., Inc., Appellants, v. Clyde E. MILLER and Arline A. Miller, AppelleesNinth Circuit· 1977-07-18· cited 25×
- Mws Wire Industries, Inc., and Cross-Appellee v. California Fine Wire Co., Inc., and Cross-AppellantNinth Circuit· 1986-08-19· cited 25×
- ASHTON COMPANY, INC., CONTR. & ENG'RS v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1969-05-28· cited 23×
- Gordon v. WolfeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-03-26· cited 21×
- Armstrong World Industries, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-11-16· cited 14×
- G. Voskanian Construction, Inc. v. Alhambra Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-03-29· cited 12×
- Weber v. JorgensenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1971-03-17· cited 11×
- Amelco Electric v. City of Thousand OaksCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-10-25
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Souza & McCue Construction Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-04-04· cited 97×
- Jackson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1924-07-01· cited 63×
- EH Morrill Co. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1967-02-10· cited 58×
- City of Salinas v. Souza & McCue Construction Co.California Supreme Court· 1967-03-21· cited 57×
- Van Meter v. Bent Construction Co.California Supreme Court· 1956-06-01· cited 50×
- D. L. Godbey & Sons Construction Co. v. DeaneCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-08-05· cited 30×
- Healy v. BrewsterCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-04-25· cited 23×
- McCree & Company v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1958-08-01· cited 23×
- MacIsaac & Menke Co. v. Cardox Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1961-07-12· cited 19×
- Montrose Contracting Co. v. County of WestchesterSecond Circuit· 1936-01-06· cited 17×
- Miller v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1955-11-08· cited 14×
- Pittsburgh Testing Laboratory, a Corporation v. Farnsworth & Chambers Co., Inc., a CorporationTenth Circuit· 1958-01-06· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.