· 5/28/1969
ASHTON COMPANY, INC., CONTR. & ENG'RS v. State
Citations
- 454 P.2d 1004
- 9 Ariz. App. 564
- 1969 Ariz. App. LEXIS 496
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- contractor not entitled to reform contract in absence of showing it did not express parties' real agreement
- court found no merit in highway construction contractor’s allegation of breach of implied warranty by state based upon state’s estimate of tonnage of borrow
- unjust enrichment “has no application to a situation where there is an explicit contract which has been performed”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hathaway
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.