Skip to main content
· 5/28/1969

ASHTON COMPANY, INC., CONTR. & ENG'RS v. State

Citations

  • 454 P.2d 1004
  • 9 Ariz. App. 564
  • 1969 Ariz. App. LEXIS 496

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • contractor not entitled to reform contract in absence of showing it did not express parties' real agreement
  • court found no merit in highway construction contractor’s allegation of breach of implied warranty by state based upon state’s estimate of tonnage of borrow
  • unjust enrichment “has no application to a situation where there is an explicit contract which has been performed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hathaway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.