Hayward v. Procunier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that prisoners had no due process right to a hearing prior to emergency lockdown at prison that lasted five months
• holding five-month lockdown did not violate Due Process Clause or Eighth Amendment
• noting, in the context of an Eighth Amendment analysis, that decisions to maintain or ease restrictions during a lock-down “are delicate ones, and those charged with them must be given reasonable leeway”
• no Eighth Amendment violation where prison 10 officials instituted month-long deprivation of outdoor exercise 11 privileges during prison lockdown
• extended lockdown five-month lockdown causing a complete deprivation of outdoor exercise in response to a genuine emergency did not satisfy the objective element of the Eighth Amendment analysis
• no due process right to a hearing in connection with a five-month lockdown

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Thomas v. Ponder
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-07-16· cited 507×
• Norwood v. Vance
  Ninth Circuit· 2009-07-09· cited 147×
• Hernandez v. Cate
  C.D. California· 2013-01-18· cited 26×
• Allen v. Sakai
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-11-15· cited 17×
• Allen v. City & County of Honolulu
  Ninth Circuit· 1994-10-28· cited 11×
• Norwood v. Woodford
  S.D. California· 2008-09-05· cited 3×
• Williams v. Garcia
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-05-18· cited 1×
• Corona v. Knowles
  Ninth Circuit· 2017-04-19· cited 1×
• Norwood v. Vance
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-01-07
• Richardson v. Runnels
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-01-12
• Snow v. Lamarque
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-09-15
• Williams v. Adams
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-08-05
• Armstrong v. Garcia
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-11-13

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wolff v. McDonnell
  Supreme Court· 1974-06-26· cited 12,327×
• Meachum v. Fano
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 3,743×
• Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex
  Supreme Court· 1979-05-29· cited 3,299×
• Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1978-04-03· cited 2,329×
• Vitek v. Jones
  Supreme Court· 1980-03-25· cited 1,747×
• Montanye v. Haymes
  Supreme Court· 1976-06-25· cited 1,017×
• Johnny L. Spain v. Raymond K. Procunier
  Ninth Circuit· 1979-07-30· cited 422×
• Roger O. La Batt and Robert Cook v. John J. Twomey, Rudolph L. Lucien v. Peter B. Bensinger and John J. Twomey, Holice P. Black v. John J. Twomey
  Seventh Circuit· 1975-01-08· cited 117×
• Wright v. Enomoto
  N.D. California· 1978-02-21· cited 107×
• Dappolonia v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners
  Supreme Court· 1978-02-21· cited 104×
• Palmigiano v. Garrahy
  D. Rhode Island· 1977-08-10· cited 90×
• Nicholas Palmigiano v. J. Joseph Garrahy, Leonard Jefferson v. Bradford E. Southworth
  First Circuit· 1980-03-03· cited 74×
• Carl B. Hoitt, Jr. v. Joseph C. Vitek, Etc.
  First Circuit· 1974-05-16· cited 54×
• Hayward v. Procunier
  Ninth Circuit· 1980-10-03· cited 46×
• McGruder v. Phelps
  Fifth Circuit· 1979-12-26· cited 35×
• Johnson v. Anderson
  D. Delaware· 1974-02-07· cited 31×
• Raymond Gilliard v. Russell Oswald, Commissioner of Correctional Services, and J. Edwin Lavallee, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility
  Second Circuit· 1977-03-16· cited 19×
• Jefferson v. Southworth
  D. Rhode Island· 1978-02-03· cited 14×
• Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board
  D.C. Circuit· 1976-10-28· cited 3×