Armstrong v. Garcia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the parties do not dispute that Connecticut’s personal injury statute of limitations applies to Title VI claim
• “Section 52–577 of the Connecticut General Statutes . . . has apparently never been held by an appellate court of Connecticut to be subject to the doctrine of equitable tolling. Instead, section 52–577 has been labeled a statute of repose.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).