Hayward v. Marshall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because “the Governor’s reversal of parole ... was not supported by any evidence that Hayward’s release would threaten public safety ... the Governor’s reversal of his parole thus violated his due process rights”
• finding that prisoner’s many prior arrests which occurred thirty or more years ago do not support conclusion that prisoner is a danger to society
• rejecting the Governor’s reliance on unchanging factors as “some evidence” that a prisoner is unsuitable for parole
• Governor’s reversal of the board’s parole grant deprived petitioner of a constitutionally protected liberty interest
• “The principle that state law gives rise to liberty interests that may be enforced as a matter of federal law is long-established.”
• Governor’s reliance on the unchanging factor of prisoner’s motive for committing the crime violated prisoner’s due process rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Hayward v. Marshall
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-04-22· cited 372×
• Rodriguez ex rel. Estate of Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
  Federal Claims· 2010-02-22· cited 123×
• In Re Lugo
  California Court of Appeal· 2008-07-21· cited 24×
• Judulang v. Chertoff
  S.D. California· 2008-06-10· cited 10×
• Milot v. Haws
  C.D. California· 2009-06-08· cited 6×
• McCarns v. Dexter
  C.D. California· 2008-01-28· cited 5×
• May v. Chertoff
  S.D. California· 2008-06-10· cited 5×
• Gordon v. Alexander
  S.D. New York· 2009-01-05· cited 2×
• Opalec v. Curry
  N.D. California· 2008-03-20· cited 2×
• Brazil v. Davison
  C.D. California· 2009-07-25· cited 2×
• In Re Rozzo
  California Court of Appeal· 2008-02-05· cited 1×
• Ledesma v. Marshall
  E.D. California· 2009-08-05· cited 1×
• Rose v. Kane
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-03-18· cited 1×
• McCullough v. Kane
  Ninth Circuit· 2010-12-27
• Valdivia v. Brown
  E.D. California· 2008-03-14
• Nakashima v. Kane
  N.D. California· 2008-04-22
• Miranda v. Carey
  E.D. California· 2010-10-13
• Englund v. Sisto
  E.D. California· 2009-10-23
• Hart v. Curry
  N.D. California· 2010-08-05
• Greenwood v. Ayers
  N.D. California· 2008-10-14

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. Taylor
  Supreme Court· 2000-04-18· cited 15,929×
• Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. Hill
  Supreme Court· 1985-06-17· cited 4,010×
• Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional Complex
  Supreme Court· 1979-05-29· cited 3,299×
• Kentucky Department of Corrections v. Thompson
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-15· cited 2,461×
• Ylst v. Nunnemaker
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-24· cited 2,430×
• Carey v. Musladin
  Supreme Court· 2006-12-11· cited 1,245×
• Donald Eugene Lambert v. James Blodgett, Donald Eugene Lambert v. James Blodgett
  Ninth Circuit· 2004-12-28· cited 542×
• In Re Rosenkrantz
  California Supreme Court· 2002-12-16· cited 351×
• In Re Dannenberg
  California Supreme Court· 2005-01-24· cited 225×
• Brian Sass v. California Board of Prison Terms Attorney General of the State of California
  Ninth Circuit· 2006-08-31· cited 189×
• Jeffrey J. Biggs v. Cal A. Terhune, Director of Wbs/jfm CDC California Board of Prison Terms Board of Prison Terms
  Ninth Circuit· 2003-06-30· cited 142×
• Irons v. Carey
  Ninth Circuit· 2007-07-13· cited 90×
• Miguel Rosas v. James Nielsen
  Ninth Circuit· 2005-11-04· cited 78×
• In Re Scott
  California Court of Appeal· 2005-10-18· cited 57×
• In Re Wen Lee
  California Court of Appeal· 2006-10-17· cited 42×
• In Re Elkins
  California Court of Appeal· 2006-10-31· cited 37×
• Rosenkrantz v. Marshall
  C.D. California· 2006-08-01· cited 17×