Skip to main content

Hayes v. State

Citations

  • 592 So. 2d 327
  • 1992 WL 280

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “There is no exception in rule 3.111(b)(1) for contempt prosecutions resulting in imprisonment of an indigent. ...”
  • “It is difficult, however, for us to understand how Hayes’s conduct can be considered to have been committed in the ‘actual presence of the court’, when it was Hayes’s absence from the presence of the court that caused the judge to complain.”
  • after a criminal defendant left during a break to bring a witness back to court but arrived to court late, the trial judge required the defendant to appear at a hearing three weeks later and show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court
  • after a criminal defendant left during a break to bring a witness back to court but arrived to court late, the trial judge required the defendant to appear at a hearing three weeks later and show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farmer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.