District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1/3/1992
Hayes v. State
Citations
- 592 So. 2d 327
- 1992 WL 280
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “There is no exception in rule 3.111(b)(1) for contempt prosecutions resulting in imprisonment of an indigent. ...”
- “It is difficult, however, for us to understand how Hayes’s conduct can be considered to have been committed in the ‘actual presence of the court’, when it was Hayes’s absence from the presence of the court that caused the judge to complain.”
- after a criminal defendant left during a break to bring a witness back to court but arrived to court late, the trial judge required the defendant to appear at a hearing three weeks later and show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court
- after a criminal defendant left during a break to bring a witness back to court but arrived to court late, the trial judge required the defendant to appear at a hearing three weeks later and show cause why he should not be held in contempt of court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Farmer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Kelley v. RiceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-05· cited 31×
- Woods v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-07· cited 22×
- Woods v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-06-03· cited 20×
- Noel Plank v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2016-03-17· cited 17×
- State of Florida v. Alex Diaz de la PortillaSupreme Court of Florida· 2015-11-05· cited 10×
- Al-Hakim v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-02-09· cited 9×
- Speer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-08-20· cited 7×
- Plank v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-01-29· cited 6×
- Alex Diaz De La Portilla v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-07-30· cited 2×
- Pole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-10· cited 2×
- Stermer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-11-20· cited 2×
- Bell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-09-14· cited 2×
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- In Re OliverSupreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 2,065×
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court· 1962-04-30· cited 1,897×
- Scott v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1979-03-05· cited 1,061×
- In Re GreenSupreme Court· 1962-05-21· cited 103×
- Andrews v. WaltonSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-03-24· cited 65×
- Saunders v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-05-09· cited 41×
- Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1991-10-10· cited 30×
- Fox v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-06-19· cited 7×
- State v. SaundersSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-03-31· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.