Skip to main content
· 7/20/1982

Hayes v. RCA Service Co.

Citations

  • 546 F. Supp. 661
  • 31 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 246
  • 1982 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14608

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying this venue framework to claims concomitantly brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1981
  • “This prong focuses on ‘the place where the decisions and actions concerning the employment practices occurred,’ not the location where a plaintiff received notice of Defendant’s conduct or suffered from its effects”
  • “This prong focuses on ‘the place where the decisions and actions concerning the employment practices occurred,’ not the location where a plaintiff received notice of Defendant’s conduct or suffered from its effects”
  • “[U]nless Title VII is considered the primary cause of action for this type of employment discrimination case, the venue provision intended by Congress could be effectively written out of the statute by using a companion cause of action.”
  • “[U]nless Title VII is considered the primary cause of action for this type of employment discrimination case, the venue provision intended by Congress could be effectively written out of the statute by using a companion cause of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sirica

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.