Hayes Construction Co. v. Silverthorn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant’s assertions as to the merits of a Coleman furnace, “that it would do the job, that is was miserly in its consumption of fuel, and the maintenance nil, [were] puffing.”
• in an action at law court reviewed sufficiency of the evidence for fraud under the preponderance of the evidence standard
• in an action at law court reviewed sufficiency of the evidence for fraud under the preponderance of the evidence standard

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).