Schuler v. American Motors Sales Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the availability of written inventory lists made plaintiffs reliance on oral statements about the inventory unreasonable
• “Plaintiff cannot show a misrepresentation by ignoring a part of information supplied him, and then later claim he was defrauded because he was not told of the facts which he chose to ignore.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).