Indiana Supreme Court· 7/21/1978
Hawkins v. State
Citations
- 378 N.E.2d 819
- 269 Ind. 16
- 1978 Ind. LEXIS 729
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- inexperience does not necessarily amount to ineffective representation unless the trial, considered as a whole, is reduced to a mockery of justice, shocking to the conscience of the reviewing court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pivarnik
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Norris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1979-09-19· cited 80×
- Inman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1979-09-07· cited 58×
- Gaunt v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1983-12-30· cited 41×
- Bray v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1982-02-11· cited 34×
- McMahan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1978-11-09· cited 32×
- Hall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-05-20· cited 21×
- Wood v. Superior CourtAlaska Supreme Court· 1984-10-30· cited 16×
- Rivera v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1979-02-01· cited 10×
- Bumgardner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-07-14· cited 4×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1976-07-22· cited 7,936×
- Coker v. GeorgiaSupreme Court· 1977-06-29· cited 1,233×
- Blackburn v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1973-01-24· cited 243×
- Pulliam v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1976-04-14· cited 102×
- Roberts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1977-03-10· cited 41×
- Dull v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1978-02-06· cited 35×
- Colvin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1976-05-20· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.