Hawkins v. Hart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that an issue not included in the statement of issues presented for review is not properly before this Court
• explaining that a party’s failure to make a legal argument and cite authority in support of the party’s position on appeal will constitute a waiver of that issue
• stating that “[c]ourts have consistently held that issues must be included in the Statement of Issues Presented for Review required by Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure 27(a)(4). An issue not included is not properly before the Court of Appeals.”
• “Courts have consistently held that issues must be included in the Statement of Issues Presented for Review required by Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure 27(a)(4).”
• “Courts have consistently held that . . . [a]n issue not included [in the statement of issues] is not properly before the Court of Appeals.”
• “Courts have consistently held that…[a]n issue not included [in the statement of issues] is not properly before the Court of Appeals.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).