Betty Goff C. Cartwright v. Jackson Capital Partners, Limited Partnership

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the vague issue regarding “evidentiary issues” was not sufficient to raise the alleged evidentiary errors on appeal
• holding that the appellant waived a challenge to the trial court’s evidentiary ruling by only designating the trial court’s grant of summary judgment as an issue on appeal
• involving claims by a beneficiary of various trusts against several defendants serving as trustees and co-trustees
• following a remand in Cartwright I, affirming summary judgment in favor of the Garners, resulting in the dismissal of all claims by Mr. Cartwright, and affirming the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees
• following a remand in Cartwright I, affirming summary judgment in favor of the Garners, resulting in the dismissal of all claims by Mr. Cartwright, and affirming the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees
• “[A]ppellate courts do not sit as self-directed boards of legal inquiry and research, but essentially as arbiters of legal questions presented and argued by the parties before them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).