Havemeyer v. Superior Court
Citations
- 84 Cal. 327
- 24 P. 121
- 1890 Cal. LEXIS 813
Syllabus
<p>Appointment op Receiver—Forfeiture of Corporate Charter—Jurisdiction in Quo Warranto. — The superior court has no jurisdiction to appoint a receiver of the property of a corporation in a quo warranto proceeding, upon judgment of forfeiture of its corporate charter. The rendition of the judgment authorized by section 80S of the Code of Civil Procedure ends the proceeding, and no receiver can be appointed unless a new suit is commenced by a creditor or stockholder of the corporation for that purpose, under section 565 of the Code of Civil Procedure.</p> <p>Ed. — Disposition of Property of Dissolved Corporation. — When a corporation ceases to exist, from whatever cause, its property is left to be disposed of according to law; and upon the dissolution of a trading corporation by judgment of forfeiture, its property neither reverts to the grantors, nor escheats to the state, but belongs, after payment of its debts, to those who were stockholders at the date of its dissolution.</p> <p>Ed. —Jurisdiction of Equity. —In the absence of a statute regulating the matter, a court of equity would have the right, at the suit of a stockholder or creditor, to appoint a receiver to administer the property of a dissolved corporation.</p> <p>Id. — Construction of Code •— Rights of Directors upon Involuntary Dissolution. — Under sections 400 and 565 of the Code of Civil Procedure, both of which refer to involuntary as well as voluntary dissolutions of corporations, the administration and distribution of the assets of a dissolved corporation is left, as a rule, to the directors in office at the date of dissolution, though such dissolution be upon judgment of forfeiture; and the appointment of a receiver is an exception, to be made only in cases of neglect of duty or abuse of power by the directors, when required for the protection of the rights of a creditor or stockholder.</p> <p>Id. — Receiver in Cases of Forfeiture. — The provision of section 564 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to t
Judges: Beatty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
89 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Clark v. WilliardSupreme Court· 1934-04-02· cited 115×
- In re HayesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-03-17· cited 108×
- Lerner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1952-03-25· cited 91×
- State ex rel. Wright v. BarneyNebraska Supreme Court· 1937-12-17· cited 77×
- Oak Grove School District v. City Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-06-28· cited 75×
- Evans v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1939-11-09· cited 56×
- Bruner v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-12-12· cited 56×
- Monette Road Improvement District v. DudleySupreme Court of Arkansas· 1920-05-24· cited 50×
- Monterey Club v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-11-28· cited 44×
- Pierce v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1934-11-02· cited 44×
- State Inv. & Ins. Co. v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-01-25· cited 42×
- Golden State Glass Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1939-04-29· cited 41×
- Bedal v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court· 1923-07-05· cited 41×
- State ex rel. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri· 1909-06-08· cited 39×
- Howell v. BuddCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-09-22· cited 38×
- Grant v. Superior Court of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1895-03-09· cited 38×
- State ex rel. McEntee v. BrightSupreme Court of Missouri· 1909-12-21· cited 31×
- State ex rel. Parsons Mining Co. v. McClureNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1913-05-16· cited 29×
- Sunset Farms, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1935-10-08· cited 28×
- United States v. LaflinNinth Circuit· 1928-02-27· cited 27×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People ex rel. Bishop v. Kingston & Middletown Turnpike Road Co.New York Supreme Court· 1840-05-15· cited 50×
- Coker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1881-07-01· cited 42×
- Powelson v. LockwoodCalifornia Supreme Court· 1890-01-29· cited 28×
- Levy v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1886-03-17· cited 26×
- Clark v. Superior Court of Lassen CountyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 25×
- In re CohenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1855-07-01· cited 22×
- Chuck v. Quan Wo Chong Co.California Supreme Court· 1889-11-19· cited 20×
- Baughman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1887-06-22· cited 18×
- Baker v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1887-01-22· cited 14×
- French v. NoelSupreme Court of Virginia· 1872-07-16· cited 14×
- Wreden v. Superior Court of Stanislaus CountyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 12×
- More v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1883-11-28· cited 9×
- Hull v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1883-02-16· cited 8×
- Alexander v. DenaveauxCalifornia Supreme Court· 1881-10-15· cited 3×
- Mancello v. BellrudeCalifornia Supreme Court· 1886-06-15· cited 2×
- Haile v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-03-19· cited 1×
- Childs v. EdmundsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1886-03-09· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.