Levy v. Wilson
Citations
- 69 Cal. 105
- 10 P. 272
- 1886 Cal. LEXIS 635
Syllabus
<p>Prohibition when Lies — Legal Remedy.—Prohibition lies to arrest the proceedings of a judicial tribunal when they are without or in excess of its jurisdiction, but the writ is issuable only in cases where there is not a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law.</p> <p>Id.—Irregularities before and after Indictment — Appeal.—The trial of a criminal case will not be restrained by prohibition for mere irregularities and errors in law occurring before and after the finding and return of the indictment. Such matters are reviewuble on appeal.</p> <p>Id.—Illegal Grand Jury—-Indictment by is Void.—An accusatory paper, found by a body of men styling themselves a grand jury, but who were not a valid and constitutional grand jury, is void and worthless as an indictment, and the Superior Court has no power to try a prisoner under it.</p> <p>Id.—Order for Drawing Grand Jury—Amendment of.—An order for the drawing of a grand jury for the city and county of San Francisco was made in the Superior Court and filed with the county clerk on the 8th of July, 1885. The order was signed by the presiding judge of the court, and by the judge of the department in which the drawing was to take place, and designated 1 o’clock, p. M., as the hour for the drawing. At the opening of the court at 10 o’clock, A. M., on that day, the judge of the department amended the order by changing the hour for the drawing to 10 o’clock, A. M., and thereupon the clerk, in open court, and in the presence of the judge, but during the absence of the presiding judge, proceeded with the drawing in the manner prescribed by section 219 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Held, that the absence of the presiding judge did not invalidate the drawing.</p> <p>Id.—Jurisdiction.—Held further, that the change made by the judge of the department in the original order did not divest the court of jurisdiction over the proceeding, and that the order was not void.</p> <p>Id. — Deficiency in Original Panel — S
Judges: McKee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.