Hatton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “incarcerative portions of all counts must be completed before the probationary portion of any count begins”
• explaining that incarcerative portions of all counts of sentence must be completed before probationary portion of a related count begins
• affirming a two-count sentence which required the defendant to serve three months in county jail followed by two years probation on Count I, to run concurrent with his Count II sentence of one year in county jail followed by three years of probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Foster v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-12-17· cited 3×
• Renaldo J. Bell v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-04-13· cited 1×
• Regisma v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-21· cited 1×
• Smith v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-09-26· cited 1×
• Robinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-08-24· cited 1×
• STATE OF FLORIDA v. EDWARD FIDDEMON
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2020-05-27

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bernhardt v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1974-01-09· cited 182×
• Barr v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-23· cited 12×
• Horner v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1993-04-15· cited 10×
• Dewitt v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-07-08· cited 6×
• Hill v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-10-06· cited 3×