Harvey v. Sullivan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Pro se parties are generally bound by the same rules of practice and procedure as a lawyer.”
• “[T]he propounder put on a series of witnesses who established their familiarity with the testatrix’s signature and testified that the signature on the will was hers” so as to satisfy OCGA § 53-5-24.
• evidence established that witnesses were inaccessible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cook v. Huff
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-07-16· cited 40×
• Sullivan v. Sullivan
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2000-11-13· cited 16×
• White v. Regions Bank
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-03-28· cited 15×
• Delbello v. Bilyeu
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2002-02-11· cited 12×
• Westmoreland v. Tallent
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-07-05· cited 12×
• AMMONS Et Al. v. CLOUDS Et Al.
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2014-05-05· cited 3×
• Forsyth County Georgia v. Mommies Properties LLC
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-03-16
• Strong v. O'Neal
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-10-05
• Mason v. Phillips
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2012-01-23

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Skelton v. Skelton
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1983-11-16· cited 65×
• DeLamar v. Dollar
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1907-04-11· cited 28×
• Quarterman v. Quarterman
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1997-11-24· cited 19×
• Lowry v. Hamilton
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1997-09-15· cited 11×
• Weber v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-03-12· cited 8×
• Cotton, Inc. v. Phil-Dan Trucking, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1998-11-02· cited 7×
• Crumbley v. McCart
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-06-07· cited 6×
• Davis v. Gaona
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1990-09-27· cited 4×