Skip to main content
· 7/5/2001

Westmoreland v. Tallent

Citations

  • 549 S.E.2d 113
  • 274 Ga. 172
  • 2001 Ga. LEXIS 568

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that OCGA § 53-4-46 “ ‘provides the procedure to be followed where the original will is lost but a copy is available’ ”
  • holding that OCGA § 53-4-46 \`provides the procedure to be followed where the original will is lost but a copy is available'\
  • “self-proving affidavit is part of the will and a testatrix’s signature solely on the affidavit constitutes a signature on the will
  • explaining, where statute required clear and convincing evidence to overcome statutory presumption against revocation of a will, “[t]he presumption of revocation may be rebutted by circumstantial as well as direct evidence”
  • explaining, where statute required clear and convincing evidence to overcome statutory presumption against revocation of a will, \[t]he presumption of revocation may be rebutted by circumstantial as well as direct evidence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hunstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.