Hartman v. Potter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the cardinal rule of deed construction” is that “the intention of the parties as drawn from the whole deed must govern”
• stating that “the cardinal rule of deed construction” is that “the intention of the parties as drawn from the whole deed must govern” (footnote omitted)
• stating that “the cardinal rule of deed construction” is that “the intention of the parties as drawn from the whole deed must govern” (footnote omitted)
• explaining “the cardinal rule of deed construction that the intention of the parties as drawn from the whole deed must govern” (quotation simplified)
• “In the absence of ambiguity, the construction of deeds is a question of law for the court....”
• Gilbertson v. Charlson, 301 N.W.2d 144 (N.D.1981

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).