Hartman & Eichhorn Bldg. Co., Inc. v. Dailey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that (i) the defendant could not be held individually liable for certain statements because he did not personally make those communications; (ii) the plaintiffs could not sustain a fraud claim based on one of the defendant’s letters because they did not show reliance; and (iii

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Liss v. Lewiston-Richards, Inc
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2007-06-06· cited 54×
• Elezovic v. Ford Motor Co.
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2007-04-24· cited 34×
• Galeana Telecommunications Investments, Inc. v. Amerifone Corp.
  E.D. Michigan· 2016-08-10· cited 4×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Smith v. Globe Life Insurance
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1999-07-13· cited 372×
• Warren Tool Co. v. Stephenson
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1968-04-26· cited 82×
• People v. Brown
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-05-04· cited 78×
• Allen v. Morris Building Co.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1960-06-07· cited 29×
• Forton v. Laszar
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2000-05-04· cited 22×
• Hempfling v. Burr
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1886-01-20· cited 19×
• Wines v. Crosby & Co.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1912-03-12· cited 13×
• Forton v. Laszar
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2001-02-16· cited 12×
• Joy Management Co. v. City of Detroit
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1990-04-16· cited 11×
• Zaino v. North Woodward Construction Co.
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1959-02-19· cited 8×