Michigan Court of Appeals· 4/26/1968

Warren Tool Co. v. Stephenson

Citations

161 N.W.2d 133
11 Mich. App. 274
5 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1017
1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1282

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stating that “[c]harging and retaining liens arise by reason of the lawyer-client relationship,” whereas “the equitable lien [is] dependent on a finding of express agreement”
stating that “[c]harging and retaining liens arise by reason of the lawyer-client relationship,” whereas “the equitable lien [is] dependent on a finding of express agreement”
suggesting no conversion claim where “plaintiffs . . . agree to allow [defendants] to collect such moneys and account therefor at a later time”
applying Michigan tort law and holding that “the agents and officers of a corporation are liable for torts which they personally commit, even though in doing so they act for the corporation, and even though the corporation is also liable for the tort.”
applying Michigan tort law and holding that “the agents and officers of a corporation are liable for torts which they personally commit, even though in doing so they act for the corporation, and even though the corporation is also liable for the tort.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Levin, Burns, McGregor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.