Skip to main content
· 5/23/1995

Hartline v. Celotex Corp.

Citations

  • 651 N.E.2d 582
  • 272 Ill. App. 3d 952
  • 209 Ill. Dec. 404

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding allegations that an employer manifested “intent to kill” by “exposing plaintiff to asbestos with the awareness that a strong probability of death was created” insufficient to establish the exception
  • conclusory allegations inadequate to support action for intentional tort to overcome IWCA
  • conclusory allegations inadequate to support action for intentional tort to overcome IWCA
  • asbestos exposure with “strong probability of death” insufficient to allege intentional tort
  • asbestos exposure with “strong probability of death” insufficient to allege intentional tort

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DiVITO

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.