Hart v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Since the detectives did not comply with [Rule 2.3], there was a seizure of the appellant and a violation of his rights under the Fourth Amendment unless the detectives had probable cause to arrest him.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Misskelley v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1996-04-01· cited 107×
• Sanford v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-02-05· cited 79×
• Conner v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1998-10-08· cited 47×
• State v. Bell
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-07-14· cited 34×
• Oliver v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-10-09· cited 30×
• Martin v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1997-05-05· cited 28×
• Midgett v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-04-11· cited 17×
• Verdict v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1993-12-20· cited 15×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1995-09-25· cited 7×
• Ingram v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1996-04-03· cited 4×
• Rushing v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1999-06-24· cited 4×