Skip to main content
· 1/21/1884

Hart v. Sansom

Citations

  • 110 U.S. 151
  • 3 S. Ct. 580
  • 28 L. Ed. 101
  • 1884 U.S. LEXIS 1667

Syllabus

<p>Estoppel — Evidence—Judgment.</p> <p>A decree of a State court for the removal of a cloud upon the title of land Within the State, rendered against a citizen of another State, who jias been cited by publication only, as directed by the local statutes, is no bar to an action by him in the Circuit Court of the United States to recover the land against the plaintiff in the former suit. ■</p> <p>In a suit to recover land, and to remove a cloud upon the title thereof, brought in a court of the State in which the land is, against W, H and others, the petition alleged that W ejected the plaintiff and unlawfully withheld possession from him ; that H set up some pretended claim or title to the land; that the other defendants held recorded deeds thereof, which were fraudulent and void ; and that the pretended claims and deeds east a cloud upon the plaintiff’s title. Due service was made on the other defendants ; and a citation to H, who was a citizen of another State, was published as directed by the local statutes.. All the defendants were defaulted; and upon a writ of inquiry the jury found that H claimed the land, but had no title, of record or otherwise, and returned a verdict for the plaintiff. Judgment was rendered that the plaintiff recover the land of the defendants, and that the deeds mentioned in the petition be cancelled and annulled, and the cloud thereby removed and for costs, and that execution issue for the costs. Held, that this judgment was no bar to an action by H in the Circuit Court of the United States to recover the land against the plaintiff in ' the former suit.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Generally, if not universally, equity jurisdiction is exercised in personam, and not in rem, and depends upon the control of the court over the parties, by reason of their presence or residence, and not upon the place where the land lies in regard to which relief is sought.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.