Skip to main content
· 4/30/1870

Bischoff v. Wethered

Citations

  • 76 U.S. 812
  • 19 L. Ed. 829
  • 9 Wall. 812
  • 1869 U.S. LEXIS 1036

Syllabus

<p>1. A judgment recovered in the Common Pleas, at Westminster, England, against a person in the United States, without any service of process on him, or any notice of the suit other than a personal one served on him in this country, has no validity here, even of a primá facie character.</p> <p>2. On a suit at law, involving a question of priority of invention, where a patent under consideration is attempted to be invalidated by a prior patent, counsel cannot require the court to compare the two specifications, and to instruct the jury, as matter of law, whether the inventions therein described are or are not identical. The rule on the subject stated.</p>

Judges: Bradley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.