Harrison DGR44, LLC v. Luiso 44 Harrison, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in allocating a federal entitlement, Congress may preempt state family law by direct enactment
• holding that federal benefits statutes preempt state domestic relations law to the extent of conflict
• holding that federal law preempted state law’s definition of community property subject to division with respect to federal pension benefits
• holding that Railroad Retirement Act benefits are not community property subject to division upon divorce
• holding that the Railroad Retirement Act preempted application of California community property law in state divorce proceedings
• holding that the anti-alienation provision of 45 U.S.C. § 231m (1988) prohibits an individual from receiving equivalent property to her husband’s Railroad Retirement Benefits as part of a divorce

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).