Harris v. Warner & Swasey Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that there was no indication that defendant attached an affidavit so as to provide evidence reflecting existence and amount of debt
• “{M]any states provide direct protection from various debt collection practices, yet conduct violating these state laws may also violate the Act.”
• “District courts . . . ordinarily do not consider arguments raised for the first time on reply.” (citing Herring v. Sec’y, Dep’t of Corr., 397 F.3d 1338, 1342 (11th Cir. 2005

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).