Harris v. Trojan Fireworks Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Thus, we think it can be fairly said that liability attaches where a nexus exists between the employment and the activity which results in an injury that is foreseeable.”
• this case applied Dickinson reasoning to a situation where employer sued under respondeat superior did not actually provide liquor but permitted it to be served
• sufficient connection between employment and employer’s Christmas party to raise scope of employment issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Harris v. Trojan Fireworks Co.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Harris v. Trojan Fireworks Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-05-14· cited 3×