Carson v. Maurer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the right to a remedy is an \important substantive right\ requiring an intermediate level of scrutiny
• holding that the right to a remedy is an \important substantive right\ requiring an intermediate level of scrutiny
• holding a noneconomic damages cap in medical malpractice actions unconstitutional as a violation of the equal protection clause of the New Hampshire Constitution
• holding limit on non-economic loss in medical-malpractice cases violates equal-protection clause of state constitution
• holding limit on non-economic loss in medical-malpractice cases violates equal-protection clause of state constitution
• analyzing statute that subjected minors to the same two-year limitation period as adults, court assessed constitutionality of statute on more stringent, middle-tier \fair and substantial\ scrutiny

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).