District Court of Appeal of Florida· 11/21/2012
Harris v. State
Citations
- 128 So. 3d 44
- 2012 WL 5870021
- 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20055
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring evidentiary hearing to resolve claims of newly discovered evidence, especially when resolution of those claims necessarily requires the trial court to make credibility determinations
- requiring evidentiary hearing to resolve claims of newly discovered evidence, especially when resolution of those claims necessarily requires the trial court to make credibility determinations
- remanding for an evidentiary hearing where nothing in the record established the affidavit was “inherently incredible”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Emas, Salter, Schwartz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-03-30· cited 4×
- Thomas R. Lamb v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-03-10· cited 3×
- Lennart S. Koo v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2016-02-11· cited 1×
- Cati v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-05-11
- NEGUS DELHALL v. THE STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-07-21
- Cathlyn Palmer v. The State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-04-17
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.