Skip to main content

Harris v. State

Citations

  • 128 So. 3d 44
  • 2012 WL 5870021
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 20055

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • requiring evidentiary hearing to resolve claims of newly discovered evidence, especially when resolution of those claims necessarily requires the trial court to make credibility determinations
  • requiring evidentiary hearing to resolve claims of newly discovered evidence, especially when resolution of those claims necessarily requires the trial court to make credibility determinations
  • remanding for an evidentiary hearing where nothing in the record established the affidavit was “inherently incredible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Emas, Salter, Schwartz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.