Skip to main content

Harris v. Carter

Citations

  • 582 A.2d 222
  • 1990 Del. Ch. LEXIS 65
  • 1990 WL 168373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating change in board control does not require demand on new board, provided no new claims are asserted
  • stating change in board control does not require demand on new board, provided no new claims are asserted
  • considering, under Aronson, “whether the accumulation of all factors creates the reasonable doubt” needed to prove demand futility
  • stating amended complaint that only expands on facts or adds new legal theories that are related to acts alleged in original pleading does not require new demand
  • stating amended complaint that only expands on facts or adds new legal theories that are related to acts alleged in original pleading does not require new demand
  • identifying this core principle of “established American legal doctrine” that “arises from the law of torts” and discussing its utility in the corporate dispute before the Chancellor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

57 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.