Supreme Court of South Carolina· 11/1/2010
Harris Teeter, Inc. v. Moore & Van Allen, PLLC
Citations
- 701 S.E.2d 742
- 390 S.C. 275
- 2010 S.C. LEXIS 346
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the plaintiff's second expert failed to satisfy the \most probably\ standard and thereby failed to establish that the defendants' alleged acts of professional negligence were the \but for\ cause of the plaintiff's loss
- holding a \conclusory statement that Respondents breached the standard of care does not create a genuine issue of material fact\
- affirming summary judgment on legal malpractice claim due in part to lack of expert testimony necessary to prove proximate cause
- affirming grant of summary judgment in favor of law firm for legal malpractice action arising out law firm's alleged failure to settle dispute prior to arbitration
- affirming grant of summary judgment in favor of law firm for legal malpractice action arising out law firm’s alleged failure to settle dispute prior to arbitration
- stating “a plaintiff in a legal malpractice action must establish this standard of care by expert testimony”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kittredge, Toal, Beatty, Moore, Hearn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Stokes-Craven Holding Corp. v. RobinsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2016-05-25· cited 39×
- McClurg v. DeatonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2011-09-06· cited 33×
- Gibson v. EptingCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2019-01-09· cited 27×
- Jones v. LattimerDistrict of Columbia· 2014-03-06· cited 15×
- Tuten v. JoelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-08-27· cited 7×
- Johnson v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2015-07-29· cited 4×
- In the Matter of WildSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2010-10-29· cited 2×
- Bass v. South Carolina Department of Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2013-02-27· cited 2×
- South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing, & Regulation v. ChastainCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2011-03-23· cited 1×
- Johnson v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2014-03-19· cited 1×
- Shevlin Smith v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Virginia· 2015-02-26
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-05-13· cited 261×
- Hancock v. Mid-South Management Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-01-26· cited 163×
- Kiriakides v. United Artists Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-01-17· cited 125×
- Ex Parte MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-09· cited 109×
- Summer v. CarpenterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1997-09-22· cited 102×
- David v. McLeod Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2006-01-23· cited 95×
- Brockbank v. Best Capital Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-06-29· cited 88×
- Woodruff v. TomlinSixth Circuit· 1980-02-21· cited 82×
- Rydde v. MorrisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-03-23· cited 69×
- Holy Loch Distributors, Inc. v. HitchcockSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-05-01· cited 58×
- Oliver v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-10-05· cited 57×
- Sun Valley Potatoes, Inc. v. Rosholt, Robertson & TuckerIdaho Supreme Court· 1999-05-28· cited 55×
- Crosby v. JonesSupreme Court of Florida· 1998-01-15· cited 53×
- Cothran v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2004-01-27· cited 46×
- Smith v. HaynsworthSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-07-01· cited 42×
- Biomet Inc. v. Finnegan Henderson LLPDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-03-19· cited 41×
- Ellis Ex Rel. Ellis v. OliverSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1996-06-17· cited 33×
- McKnight v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-09-09· cited 26×
- Hudson v. WindholzCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-02-18· cited 22×
- Anderson v. the Augusta ChronicleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-10-03· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.