Skip to main content
· 10/5/1992

Oliver v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public Transportation

Citations

  • 422 S.E.2d 128
  • 309 S.C. 313
  • 1992 S.C. LEXIS 209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that causation in fact is proved by showing that plaintiffs injury would not have occurred “but for” defendant’s negligence
  • stating that causation in fact is proved by showing that plaintiff's injury would not have occurred \but for\ defendant's negligence
  • ruling causation in fact is proved by establishing that the injury would not have occurred “but for” the defendant’s negligence
  • holding the legal cause component of proximate cause is ordinarily question of fact for jury
  • holding the legal cause component of proximate cause is ordinarily question of fact for jury
  • stating that proximate cause requires proof of causation in fact and legal cause

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Chandler, Finney, Moore, Shaw

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.