· 10/5/1992
Oliver v. South Carolina Department of Highways & Public Transportation
Citations
- 422 S.E.2d 128
- 309 S.C. 313
- 1992 S.C. LEXIS 209
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that causation in fact is proved by showing that plaintiffs injury would not have occurred “but for” defendant’s negligence
- stating that causation in fact is proved by showing that plaintiff's injury would not have occurred \but for\ defendant's negligence
- ruling causation in fact is proved by establishing that the injury would not have occurred “but for” the defendant’s negligence
- holding the legal cause component of proximate cause is ordinarily question of fact for jury
- holding the legal cause component of proximate cause is ordinarily question of fact for jury
- stating that proximate cause requires proof of causation in fact and legal cause
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Toal, Chandler, Finney, Moore, Shaw
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.