Skip to main content

Harris County v. Dillard

Citations

  • 883 S.W.2d 166
  • 37 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 324
  • 1994 Tex. LEXIS 16
  • 1994 WL 1928

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that overly expansive reading of definition of “employee” would “reflect a view of governmental immunity not shared by the Legislature.”
  • concluding that overly expansive reading of definition of “employee” would “reflect[] a view of governmental immunity not shared by the Legislature.”
  • holding that plaintiffs suing county under TTCA need not comply with presentment requirement because the TTCA requires plaintiff to give notice of claim within six months of injury
  • holding that plaintiffs suing county under TTCA need not comply with presentment requirement because the TTCA requires plaintiff to give notice of claim within six months of injury
  • holding that a volunteer reserve deputy sheriff is not an employee under the TTCA
  • rejecting argument that governmental entities should be liable for persons who act on entities' behalf without compensation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cornyn, Doggett, Enoch, Gammage, Gonzalez, Hecht, Hightower, Phillips, Spector

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

79 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Harris County v. Dillard

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.