Harrington v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• defendant’s incriminating statements were voluntary; the officers did not engage in deception and were unaware of defendant’s cognitive impairments because he appeared to be of average intelligence and understood their questions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Boney v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2008-01-29· cited 33×
• Howard v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2004-10-28· cited 21×
• Jeffrey Archer v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2013-09-30· cited 19×
• Kien v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2007-05-17· cited 16×
• Richard v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-01-14· cited 12×
• Aldridge v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2002-12-09· cited 7×
• D.G. v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2011-04-13· cited 4×
• DG v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2011-04-13
• The Hope Source, Max Sigmon, Julie Brant Gordon, and Dr. Momi Yamanaka v. B.T., by his mother and next friend, Melissa Troutman
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-09-20

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Batson v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 16,401×
• Wright v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1997-12-29· cited 139×
• McCants v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1997-11-03· cited 45×
• Ringo v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2000-10-18· cited 39×
• Newsome v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1997-10-14· cited 23×
• Russell v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-07-13· cited 14×
• Barnett v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1994-07-25· cited 9×
• Burrell v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1998-10-26· cited 6×