Harper v. TRW, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the FCRA did not completely preempt a plaintiff’s state law claims and that those claims were therefore not removeable
• holding that FCRA’s grant of concurrent jurisdiction “weighs heavily against preemption”
• “This grant of ‘concurrent’ jurisdiction is wholly absent in the LMRA and ERISA. Indeed, the jurisdictional grants in both the LMRA and ERISA are grants of exclusive federal court jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).