Broom v. TRW Credit Data

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), provides for the removal of cases ‘brought in a State court.’ The word ‘brought’ in this instance is intended to have no more than its usual connotation of ‘commenced.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lockard v. Equifax, Inc.
  Eleventh Circuit· 1998-12-31· cited 70×
• Etefia v. Credit Technologies, Inc
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2001-04-27· cited 67×
• Salei v. Boardwalk Regency Corp.
  E.D. Michigan· 1996-01-23· cited 23×
• Harper v. TRW, INC.
  E.D. Michigan· 1995-03-31· cited 15×
• McGilvray v. Hallmark Financial Group, Inc.
  E.D. Virginia· 1995-07-06· cited 2×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs
  Supreme Court· 1966-03-28· cited 13,852×
• American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn
  Supreme Court· 1951-04-09· cited 1,278×
• Haun v. Retail Credit Co.
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1976-10-01· cited 44×
• Sicinski v. Reliance Funding Corp.
  S.D. New York· 1978-12-11· cited 26×
• Ruth v. Westinghouse Credit Co., Inc.
  W.D. Oklahoma· 1974-03-22· cited 12×
• Aben v. Dallwig
  E.D. Michigan· 1987-05-12· cited 5×
• Griffin v. Hooper-Holmes Bureau, Inc.
  M.D. Florida· 1976-04-21· cited 3×