Harp v. Appliance Mart, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting Kansas’ previous Trademark Act and stating that ’’[w]hen Kansas enacted its law, it chose not to include that portion of the federal law granting protection to a mark that has become distinctive based on continuous use for five years.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).