Conti v. Anthony's Shear Perfection, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that owner of hair salon “Shear Perfection” could enjoin another salon named “Anthony’s Shear Perfection” from identifying his salon with the phrase “Shear Perfection”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• WPNT INC. v. Secret Communication Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-07-12· cited 16×
• Molecular Diagnostics Laboratories v. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc.
  District of Columbia· 2005-12-01· cited 13×
• Walgreen Co. v. Organon, Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 2004-09-08· cited 7×
• Harp v. Appliance Mart, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1992-03-13· cited 5×
• In Re Remeron Antitrust Litigation
  D. New Jersey· 2007-02-25· cited 5×
• Advanced Automation Associates Inc. v. Advanced Automation Inc.
  Cumberland County Court of Common Pleas· 2000-04-05
• Scranton Times v. Entercom Wilkes-Barre Scranton LLC
  Lackawanna County Court of Common Pleas· 2011-03-24

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• KoolVent Metal Awning Corp. of America v. Price
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1951-11-15· cited 30×
• Goebel Brewing Co. v. Esslingers, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-03-23· cited 26×
• Zimmerman v. Holiday Inns of America, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-05-28· cited 26×
• Gamlen Chemical Co. v. Gamlen
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1948-07-29· cited 25×
• Miscellaneous, Inc. v. Klein's Fashions, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1973-05-23· cited 12×