Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. Carpenter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that recall letters are not admissible to show that a defect exists in a particular product

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Carey v. General Motors Corp.
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1979-04-04· cited 72×
• Parsons v. Ford Motor Co.
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-09-19· cited 27×
• Bailey v. Monaco Coach Corp.
  N.D. Georgia· 2004-11-10· cited 25×
• Webster v. Body Dynamics, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-02-24· cited 5×
• Brantley v. Snapper Power Equipment
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-09-06· cited 4×
• Gardner v. Ford Motor Co.
  M.D. Florida· 2015-08-19· cited 3×
• Harold Parsons and Peggy Parsons v. Ford Motor Company and SRH, Inc. D/B/A Billy Young Isuzu Billy Young Lincoln Mercury And Billy Young Suzuki
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2002-06-21
• Alcan Aluminio Do Brasil, S.A. v. Hernandez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-12-19

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fields v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 1976-07-27· cited 182×
• Bould v. Touchette
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-07-28· cited 164×
• Lassitter v. Intern. Union of Op. Engin.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-05-26· cited 139×
• Blackburn v. Dorta
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1977-05-05· cited 124×
• Mrs. Lois B. Nevels v. Ford Motor Company
  Fifth Circuit· 1971-03-24· cited 73×
• Hall v. Holton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-04-28· cited 19×
• State v. Sgobbo
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-09-28· cited 1×