Supreme Court of New Jersey· 4/27/1953
Harker v. McKissock
Citations
- 96 A.2d 660
- 12 N.J. 310
- 1953 N.J. LEXIS 246
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The essence of voluntary integration is the intentional reduction of the act to a single memorial; and where such is the case the law deems the writing to be the sole and indisputable repository of the intention of the parties.”
- \The essence of voluntary integration is the intentional reduction of the act to a single memorial; and where such is the case the law deems the writing to be the sole and indisputable repository of the intention of the parties.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vanderbilt, Heher, Oliphant, Wachenfeld, Burling
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-12-10· cited 227×
- Garden State Plaza Corp. v. SS Kresge Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1963-03-21· cited 53×
- Dover Shopping Center, Inc. v. Cushman's Sons, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1960-10-17· cited 40×
- Filmlife, Inc. v. Mal\ Z\ Ena, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-11-14· cited 40×
- Morris Cty. Fair Hous. Council v. Boonton Tp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1984-05-25· cited 38×
- Kaufman v. ShoenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1952-10-21· cited 31×
- Crescent Pk. Tenants Assoc. v. Realty Eq. Corp. of NYSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1971-03-22· cited 30×
- Matter of Integrity Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-03-06· cited 29×
- Rizzo v. AmmondD. New Jersey· 1960-03-28· cited 27×
- In Re Baby\ M\New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1987-03-31· cited 19×
- In Re Petition of GardinerNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1961-05-09· cited 15×
- Merin v. Yegen Holdings Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1990-03-06· cited 5×
- McCormack Terminal Co. v. F.A. Potts & Co. (In Re F.A. Potts & Co.)E.D. Pennsylvania· 1984-08-27· cited 3×
- J.I. Kislak Realty Corp. v. 6051 Boulevard East Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1983-12-21
- Despina Alice Christakos v. Anthony A. Boyadjis, Esq.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2026-01-20
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court· 1917-03-06· cited 264×
- Pickett v. WalshMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1906-10-16· cited 138×
- Carpenters' Union v. Citizens Committee to Enforce the Landis AwardIllinois Supreme Court· 1928-12-20· cited 60×
- Purcell v. SummersFourth Circuit· 1944-11-13· cited 49×
- Grand Lodge Improved, Benevolent, Protective Order of Elks of the World v. Eureka Lodge No. 5, Independent ElksFourth Circuit· 1940-08-17· cited 30×
- National Circle, Daughters of Isabella v. National Order of Daughters of IsabellaSecond Circuit· 1920-12-15· cited 29×
- Southern Paper Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court· 1921-03-14· cited 27×
- Brigham v. Peter Bent Brigham HospitalFirst Circuit· 1904-12-07· cited 22×
- Maguire v. ReoughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1921-03-04· cited 19×
- Donovan v. DanielsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1923-03-28· cited 15×
- Brown v. HookCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1947-05-21· cited 12×
- Hanley v. American Railway Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1923-03-02· cited 12×
- Sanchez v. BowersSecond Circuit· 1934-05-07· cited 8×
- United Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees & Railway Shop Laborers v. KennedyCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1922-01-02· cited 2×
Other cases named Harker v. McKissock
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.