Filmlife, Inc. v. Mal\ Z\ Ena, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing “a distinction between fraud regarding matters expressly addressed in the integrated writing and fraud regarding matters wholly extraneous to the writing”
• noting the “general rule” that “a parol agreement which is in terms contradictory of the express words of a contemporaneous or subsequent written contract . . . necessarily is ineffectual” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).